LUSTIG v. RISIS
Plaintiff: BRYAN LUSTIG
Defendant: DANIEL RISIS
Case Number: 2:2022cv00161
Filed: January 12, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Edward S Kiel
Referring Judge: William J Martini
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Filing 13 Consent and Registration Form to receive documents electronically by DANIEL RISIS (bt)
February 24, 2022 Clerk`s Text Order - The document #12 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by DANIEL RISIS has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/4/2022. (bt)
February 18, 2022 Filing 12 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Daniel Risis. (bt)
February 18, 2022 Filing 11 Letter from Daniel Risis. (bt) (Main Document 11 replaced on 2/23/2022) (bt, ).
February 16, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BRYAN LUSTIG. DANIEL RISIS served on 1/28/2022, answer due 2/18/2022. (OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause with Temporary Restraints. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 2/9/22. (gh, )
February 7, 2022 Filing 8 Proposed Order by BRYAN LUSTIG re #5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause for Temporary Restraining Order. (OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
February 7, 2022 Filing 7 DECLARATION of Brett R. Gallaway re #5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause for Temporary Restraining Order by BRYAN LUSTIG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Email Exchange)(OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
February 7, 2022 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Bryan Lustig re #5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause for Temporary Restraining Order by BRYAN LUSTIG. (OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
February 7, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause for Temporary Restraining Order by BRYAN LUSTIG. (OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
January 25, 2022 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Summons was issued on 1/19/2022, please see ECF #3 for Summons. (bt,)
January 20, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Summons to be Issued by BRYAN LUSTIG as to DANIEL RISIS. (OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
January 19, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to DANIEL RISIS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt,)
January 12, 2022 Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by BRYAN LUSTIG. (OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
January 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DANIEL RISIS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13107593) with JURY DEMAND, filed by BRYAN LUSTIG.(OSTROWSKI, CHESTER)
January 12, 2022 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (jr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUSTIG v. RISIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRYAN LUSTIG
Represented By: CHESTER R. OSTROWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIEL RISIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?