SANTOS DE LIMA v. RODRIGUEZ et al
| ISABELLA SANTOS DE LIMA |
| ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, JOHN TSOUKARIS, TAE D JOHNSON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DAVID NEAL and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 2:2022cv00400 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER that within 45 days after the date of entry of this Order, Respondent shall electronically file a full and complete answer to said Petition, which responds to the factual and legal allegations of the Petition. ORDERED that Petitioner may file and serve a reply in support of the Petition within 30 days after the answer is filed. etc. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 3/16/2022. (bt)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-13141890.), filed by ISABELLA SANTOS DE LIMA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Declaration of Exhibits, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit)(CROSSLEY, PETER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
