DAMCO INTERNATIONAL B.V. et al v. Motor Vessel ONE APUS et al
| DAMCO INTERNATIONAL B.V. and MAERSK LOGISTICS & SERVICES INTERNATIONAL A/S |
| Motor Vessel ONE APUS, Chidori Ship Holding LLC, JESSICA SHIPHOLDING S.A., NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD. and OCEAN NETWORKS EXPRESS PTE LTD. |
| 2:2022cv01031 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer no longer assigned to the case. (sbg, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Chidori Ship Holding LLC, JESSICA SHIPHOLDING S.A., Motor Vessel ONE APUS, NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD., OCEAN NETWORKS EXPRESS PTE LTD.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Case assigned to Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chidori Ship Holding LLC, JESSICA SHIPHOLDING S.A., Motor Vessel ONE APUS, NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD., OCEAN NETWORKS EXPRESS PTE LTD. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13214338), filed by DAMCO INTERNATIONAL B.V., MAERSK LOGISTICS & SERVICES INTERNATIONAL A/S. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(FLOYD, EDWARD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
