WILSON v. BIDEN et al
DAVID ALLEN WILSON |
USA PRESIDENT JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN JR., VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA DEVI HARRIS, JOHN ROBERTS, MICHAEL A. SHIPP, SHEILA OLIVER, MARC MCKITHEN, STEVE WILSON, KENNETH S. DOUGLAS, VIC CARSTARPHEN, GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL HARPER and JUSTICE STUART RABNER |
2:2022cv01647 |
March 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jessica S Allen |
Julien Xavier Neals |
Civil Rights: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 2511 Wiretapping |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Received by DAVID ALLEN WILSON. (ld, ) |
Filing 10 DEMAND FOR ISSUING SUMMONS BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE UNDER FRCP. RULE 4 SUMMONS from DAVID ALLEN WILSON. (Attachments: #1 Summons in a Civil Action, #2 Summons in a Civil Action2, #3 Summons in a Civil Action3, #4 Summons in a Civil Action4, #5 Summons in a Civil Action5, #6 Summons in a Civil Action6, #7 Summons in a Civil Action7, #8 Summons in a Civil Action8, #9 Summons in a Civil Action9, #10 Summons in a Civil Action10, #11 Summons in a Civil Action11, #12 Summons in a Civil Action12, #13 CM_ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey4220221)(ld, ) |
Filing 9 AMENDED APPLICATION to proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS by DAVID ALLEN WILSON. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(ld, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by DAVID ALLEN WILSON. (ld, ) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel. Motion set for 5/2/2022 before Judge Julien Xavier Neals. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, ) |
Filing 6 Exhibit A to #1 Complaint Received by DAVID ALLEN WILSON. (Attachments: #1 PETITIONER'S LETTER, #2 Rutgers Verification)(ld, ) |
Filing 8 Documents Received from DAVID ALLEN WILSON. (Attachments: #1 1-main, #2 1-1, #3 1-2, #4 1-3, #5 76916628-a6f3-4d0d-b703-46a38b787428 (2), #6 76916628-a6f3-4d0d-b703-46a38b787428 (2) (2), #7 119118546906, #8 119118546909 (1), #9 119118546909, #10 1191185469032722, #11 11911854690332722, #12 119118546906032722)(ld, ) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER REALLOCATING AND REASSIGNING CASE. Case reallocated to Newark and reassigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen for all further proceedings. Judge Michael A. Shipp, Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 03/25/22. (aw, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE for Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically by DAVID ALLEN WILSON (jdg, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono by DAVID ALLEN WILSON. (jdg, ) |
Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jdg, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application IFP, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(jdg, ) Modified on 3/24/2022 (jal, ). |
Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono. Motion set for 4/18/2022 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jdg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.