BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-100 et al
| BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. |
| JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100 and XYZ COMPANY |
| 2:2022cv04859 |
| August 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SEIZURE ORDER. The bond in the amount of $10,000.00 previously posted by Plaintiff with respect to the Temporary Restraining Order is hereby continued to secure payment of such costs and damages not to exceed such sum as may be suffered or sustained by any party who is found to be wrongfully restrained hereunder. (Finance notified). Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 8/17/2022. (wh)
|
| Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Claire C. Cecchi: Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 8/17/2022 (via Zoom). Order to follow. (Court Reporter: Walter Perelli (973-645-2514)) (jl, ) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of Ali Grace Marquart in Support of Preliminary Injunction and Seizure Order to Issue by BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order A - Order (proposed), #2 Exhibit B -POService, #3 Exhibit C - Seized Merch, #4 Exhibit D - Bootleggers)(CANNON, MAEVE) |
| Filing 6 Clerk's Certificate of Cash Deposit in the amount of $10,000; Receipt Number NEW046979 filed by BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. (Finance Notified) (mxw) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JANE DOES 1-100, JOHN DOES 1-100, XYZ COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (wh) |
|
Filing 4
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING SEIZURE ORDER and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Ordering Defendants Show Cause before this Court on 8/17/2022 at 12:00 PM before Judge Claire C. Cecchi why an Order granting preliminary injunction should not issue. Plaintiff to file a bond in the amount of $10,000. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 8/3/2022. (wh) Modified on 8/4/2022 (eaj, ). Order emailed to Finance Department.
|
| Filing 3 AO120 Trademark Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (wh) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Claire C. Cecchi: Status Conference call held on 8/3/2022. (jl, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. identifying Vivendi, SA as Corporate Parent.. (CANNON, MAEVE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13602087), filed by BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex Parte Applic for a TRO, SO etc., #3 Text of Proposed Order for TRO, SO etc., #4 Brief In Support of Application for TRO, SO, #5 Declaration of Marquart in Support of, #6 Exhibit A to Marquart Decl, #7 Exhibit B to Marquart Decl, #8 Exhibit C to Marquart Decl, #9 Certification of Counsel Pursuant to FRCP Rule 65, etc., #10 Exhibit A to Cert of Counsel, #11 Exhibit B to Cert of Counsel, #12 Exhibit C to Cert of Counsel, #13 Exhibit Trademark Report, #14 Summons Proposed Jane Does, #15 Summons Proposed John Does, #16 Summons Proposed XYZ Co)(CANNON, MAEVE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
