ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. YANGZHOU STEP TOYS & GIFTS CO., LTD. et al
| ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION |
| YANGZHOU STEP TOYS & GIFTS CO., LTD., DONG JUAN and JOHN DOES (1-10) |
| 2:2022cv05549 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to DONG JUAN, YANGZHOU STEP TOYS & GIFTS CO., LTD.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (wh) |
| Filing 3 AO121 Copyright Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (wh) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (ak, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION. (ALCANTARA, MELISSA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES (1-10), defendants unknown to Plaintiff at this time, DONG JUAN, YANGZHOU STEP TOYS & GIFTS CO., LTD. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13689987) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Complaint, #3 Exhibit B to Complaint, #4 Summons Yangzhou Step Toys, #5 Summons Dong Juan)(ALCANTARA, MELISSA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
