LUCIO v. PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC
Plaintiff: REINALDO F LUCIO
Defendant: PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC D/B/A PAUL MILLER TOYOTA OF WEST CALDWELL and PAUL MILLER IMPORTS doing business as PAUL MILLER TOYOTA OF WEST CALDWELL
Case Number: 2:2022cv05763
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Michael A Hammer
Referring Judge: William J Martini
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: The parties shall file a joint discovery plan by 11/29/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 11/22/2022. (jqb, )
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 12/1/2022 at 10:30 a.m. The parties will dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817# to join the conference. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 11/29/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 10/25/2022. (jqb, )
October 19, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by PAUL MILLER IMPORTS.(HENDRY, DIANA)
September 30, 2022 Clerk's Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order, submitted by PAUL MILLER IMPORTS has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/20/2022. (dam)
September 29, 2022 Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC. Attorney LISA R. CONSIDINE for REINALDO F LUCIO, DIANA M. HENDRY for PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC added. (HECK, ANDREW) Modified on 9/30/2022 (dam).
September 29, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC. (HECK, ANDREW) Modified on 9/30/2022 (dam).
September 29, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC from SUPERIOR COURT OF ESSES COUNTY Case Number ESX-L-5185-22. (Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13721225), filed by PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HECK, ANDREW) Modified on 9/30/2022 (dam).
September 29, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps)
September 29, 2022 Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUCIO v. PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REINALDO F LUCIO
Represented By: LISA R. CONSIDINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL MILLER IMPORTS, LLC D/B/A PAUL MILLER TOYOTA OF WEST CALDWELL
Represented By: DIANA M. HENDRY
Represented By: ANDREW JAMES HECK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL MILLER IMPORTS doing business as PAUL MILLER TOYOTA OF WEST CALDWELL
Represented By: DIANA M. HENDRY
Represented By: ANDREW JAMES HECK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?