IBARRA v. D & L PAVING CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
| SIMON CEDENO IBARRA |
| D & L PAVING CONTRACTORS, INC., J & J PAVING & SEALCOATING CORPORATION, JOSEPH MATARAZZO and GERRY FARRO |
| 2:2022cv06983 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 12/7/2022. (dam)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to D & L PAVING CONTRACTORS, INC., GERRY FARRO, J & J PAVING & SEALCOATING CORPORATION, JOSEPH MATARAZZO. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (dam) |
| Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice by SIMON CEDENO IBARRA (GLENN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D & L PAVING CONTRACTORS, INC., GERRY FARRO, J & J PAVING & SEALCOATING CORPORATION, JOSEPH MATARAZZO ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13871164) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SIMON CEDENO IBARRA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(GLENN, ANDREW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
