KILIC v. BLINKEN et al
| ERDAL KILIC |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAJORKAS, CONNN SCHRADER, CARL C. RISCH, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, KEITH DORR, JOHN THOMPSON, PHILIP R SELLINGER, MERRICK GARLAND, CONN SCHRADER and UR M. JADDOU |
| 2:2023cv01486 |
| March 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 5/3/2023. (qa, )
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ERDAL KILIC (VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANTONY BLINKEN, KEITH DORR, MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAJORKAS, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian R. Martinotti. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, KEITH DORR, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAJORKAS, CARL C. RISCH, CONNN SCHRADER, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14169933), filed by ERDAL KILIC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
