KADAKIA et al v. MAYORKAS et al
RONAK APURVA KADAKIA and SMITA MAYANK MEHTA |
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DIRECTOR UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN |
2:2023cv01632 |
March 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Katharine S Hayden |
Cathy L Waldor |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14189909), filed by RONAK APURVA KADAKIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit)(MEHTA, POOJA) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: In the future when choosing parties please choose each party individually. Do NOT select the ALL PLAINTIFFS or ALL DEFENDANTS button . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.