ROBERTS v. PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES et al
KAREEM JAMES ROBERTS |
DANIEL S. PEROTTI and PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES |
2:2024cv09995 |
October 23, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Stacey D Adams |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Negotiable Instrumen |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, DANIEL S. PEROTTI re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint re Plaintiff's Request for Motion for Default (CIALINO, THOMAS) |
Filing 13 DOCUMENTS RECEIVED regarding Plaintiff's request for motion for default judgment from KAREEM JAMES ROBERTS. (lag, ) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support filed by PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, DANIEL S. PEROTTI re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint (CIALINO, THOMAS) |
Filing 11 Letter from Defendants PennyMac Financial Services and Daniel Perotti. (CIALINO, THOMAS) |
Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE in Opposition to #4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed by KAREEM JAMES ROBERTS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(qa, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that the #10 Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss submitted by Kareem James Roberts on 11/13/2024 contains the incorrect case number. This message is for informational purposes only. (qa, ) |
Filing 9 Notice to be terminated and withdraw from Notices of Electronic filing as to case. Attorney ANDREA MARIE ROBERTS terminated. (ROBERTS, ANDREA) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Application for Refund of Fees re #1 Notice of Removal, (finance notified).. (ROBERTS, ANDREA) |
Filing 6 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, DANIEL S. PEROTTI. (ROBERTS, ANDREA) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, DANIEL S. PEROTTI. (ROBERTS, ANDREA) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, DANIEL S. PEROTTI. Responses due by 11/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrea M. Roberts, Esq., #2 Exhibit 1 - Welcome Letter, #3 Exhibit 2 - Note, #4 Exhibit 3 - Mortgage, #5 Exhibit 4 - Modification Agreement, #6 Brief, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(ROBERTS, ANDREA) |
Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion set for 12/2/2024 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (qa, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by DIANA M ENG on behalf of PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, DANIEL S. PEROTTI (ENG, DIANA) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS P. CIALINO on behalf of PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, DANIEL S. PEROTTI (CIALINO, THOMAS) |
Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Stacey D. Adams. (ak, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DANIEL S. PEROTTI, PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES from Middlesex County Superior Court, case number MID-L-005358-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15756531), filed by DANIEL S. PEROTTI, PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ROBERTS, ANDREA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.