JONES v. CHETIRKIN et al
| LARRY JONES |
| ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 2:2024cv11459 |
| December 23, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Julien Xavier Neals |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY P. KERRIGAN, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (KERRIGAN, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 3 Letter request from DAG to be removed from noticing.. (KMIECIAK, JENNIFER) |
Filing 2
ORDER TO ANSWER: The Clerk of the Court shall serve a Notice of Electronic Filing of this Order on the State of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Appellate Bureau. If Respondent does not file a motion to dismiss the Petition, they shall file a full and complete Answer to all claims asserted in the Petition withing forty-five (45) days of the entry of this Order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail. N/M. Signed by Judge Julien Xavier Neals on 1/30/2025. (wh)
|
| Filing fee received as to LARRY JONES: $ 5, receipt number TRE141866 (dmr3) |
| Filing 1 Petition Received. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit: Transcript of Sentence, #3 Exhibit: Indictment No. 0624-85F, #4 Additional Exhibits, #5 Envelope)(wh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
