YANCHAPANTA v. MAUSER PACKAGING SOLUTIONS et al
| JOSE YANCHAPANTA |
| MAUSER PACKAGING SOLUTIONS, BWAY CORPORATION, MAUSER USA, LLC, JANE DOE I-V (THESE NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AS THEIR PRESENT IDENTITIES ARE UNKNOWN), JOHN DOE I-V (THESE NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AS THEIR PRESENT IDENTITIES ARE UNKNOWN) and XYZ CORPORATION I-V (these names being fictitious as their present identities are not known) |
| 2:2025cv01166 |
| February 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Stacey D Adams |
| Evelyn Padin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Application for Refund of Fees from Jason A. Cabrera re #1 Notice of Removal,, (finance notified).. (CABRERA, JASON) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MAUSER USA, LLC, BWAY CORPORATION from Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Middlesex County Middlesex County, case number MID-L-000459-25. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-16011493), filed by MAUSER USA, LLC, BWAY CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Tab A - Original State Court Complaint, #2 Tab B - Corrected State Court Complaint, #3 Tab C - Other State Court Process, Pleadings and Orders, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(CABRERA, JASON) |
| Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge Stacey D. Adams added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
