ESPINOZA ESCOTO v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
SIDIA R. ESPINOZA ESCOTO |
WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC. D/B/A WALMART #5178, ABC COMPANIES 1-100 (FICTITIOUS ENTITIES) and JOHN DOES 1-100 (fictitious names) |
2:2025cv01255 |
February 14, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Julien Xavier Neals |
Leda D Wettre |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC. D/B/A WALMART #5178.(BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC. D/B/A WALMART #5178 identifying Walmart, Inc. (f/k/a Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) as Corporate Parent.. (BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
Filing 2 Diversity Disclosure Statement by WALMART STORES, INC., WALMART STORES, INC. D/B/A WALMART #5178. (BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WALMART STORES, INC. D/B/A WALMART #5178, WALMART STORES, INC. from Superior Court of NJ, Morris County, case number MRS-L-002515-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-16018958), filed by WALMART STORES, INC. D/B/A WALMART #5178, WALMART STORES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.