ALBERTA TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE v. AT&T CORPORATION
| ALBERTA TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE |
| AT&T CORPORATION |
| HESHA ABRAMS |
| AT&T CORPORATION |
| ALBERTA TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE |
| 3:2009cv03883 |
| August 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Morris |
| Douglas E. Arpert |
| Peter G. Sheridan |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
298
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER setting forth the construction of the disputed terms within the '505 Patent and '349 Patent. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 8/7/2014. (gxh)
|
|
Filing
296
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that 267 AT&T's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for patent exhaustion is granted as to U.S. Patent No. 6,404,734, and denied as moot with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,260,059. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 7/14/2014. (gxh)
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 69 AT&T's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/10/2012. (gxh)
|
|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER setting forth the construction of the disputed terms within the '835 Patent, '505 Patent, '734 Patent, '059 Patent, '880 Patent, '543 Patent, and '349 Patent. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 8/10/2012. (gxh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
