UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $100,714.88 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN BANK OF AMERICA PERSONAL CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 381029094350 HELD IN THE NAME OF PIETRO VARRIALE

Defendant: $100,714.88 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN BANK OF AMERICA PERSONAL CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 381029094350 HELD IN THE NAME OF PIETRO VARRIALE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 3:2013cv02238
Filed: April 9, 2013
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Trenton Office
County: Ocean
Presiding Judge: Freda L. Wolfson
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1355
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $100,714.88 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN BANK OF AMERICA PERSONAL CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 381029094350 HELD IN THE NAME OF PIETRO VARRIALE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $100,714.88 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN BANK OF AMERICA PERSONAL CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 381029094350 HELD IN THE NAME OF PIETRO VARRIALE
Represented By: DOUGLAS R. EISENBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: EVAN SCOTT WEITZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.