RESUMEBEAR HOLDINGS, CORP. v. HUARD
Plaintiff:
RESUMEBEAR HOLDINGS, CORP.
Defendant:
ERIC HUARD
Case Number:
3:2014cv04482
Filed:
July 15, 2014
Court:
New Jersey District Court
Office:
Trenton Office
County:
Mercer
Referring Judge:
Tonianne J. Bongiovanni
Presiding Judge:
Peter G. Sheridan
Nature of Suit:
Other Fraud
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
March 14, 2016 | 34 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RESUMEBEAR HOLDINGS, CORP. v. HUARD | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RESUMEBEAR HOLDINGS, CORP. | |
Represented By: | LOUIS R. LESSIG |
Represented By: | MICHAEL JOSEPH MILES |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ERIC HUARD | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.