RIZZO v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: JODY RIZZO
Defendant: FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, BARNES AND NOBLE, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPS. 1-10
Case Number: 3:2017cv00745
Filed: February 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Trenton Office
County: Ocean
Presiding Judge: Douglas E. Arpert
Presiding Judge: Peter G. Sheridan
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion for Attorney Fees. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED in part awarding $125,800 in attorneys' fees and $2,424,75 in costs and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED in part regarding the imposition of interest on these attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 10/18/2023. (mlh)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff's 30 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to the $188,000 offered to Mr. Rizzo under the group life insurance policy. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 10/23/2019. (jmh)
December 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED with regards to Counts I Vand VII. Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED with regard to Counts VI. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 12/28/2017. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RIZZO v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JODY RIZZO
Represented By: GREGORY S. HEIZLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: HEATHER JANENE AUSTIN
Represented By: JOSHUA BACHRACH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARNES AND NOBLE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ CORPS. 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?