KORCHAK v. JOHN DOE et al
| SHIRLY KORCHAK |
| JANE DOES 1-30 and JOHN DOE |
| 3:2018cv17575 |
| December 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Discovery to Serve Third Party Subpoenas Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference. Motion set for 2/4/2019 before Judge Brian R. Martinotti. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mmh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Discovery to Serve Third Party Subpoenas Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by SHIRLY KORCHAK. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration of Maxwell D. Herman and Exhibits, #3 Declaration of Shirly Korchak and Exhibit, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(HERMAN, MAXWELL) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Letter: Attorney is not admitted to the Federal Bar of New Jersey. Notice has been mailed to the attorney's address. (jmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOES 1-30, JOHN DOE (Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number NEW038255) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SHIRLY KORCHAK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(jmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
