MARTIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
TERESA MARTIN |
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON |
3:2019cv00447 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Douglas E Arpert |
Freda L Wolfson |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Transmittal Letter for remanded case to Middlesex County Courthouse*56 Paterson StreetNew Brunswick, NJ 08903 State No: MID-L367-19. Mailed certified copy of the Order remanding case. (mps) |
Filing 4 CONSENT ORDER that the Notice of Removal filed on 1/14/2019 is withdrawn. This matter is remanded back to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 1/28/2019. (mps) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID R. KOTT on behalf of ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON (KOTT, DAVID) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON. (CRAWFORD, KELLY) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON from Superior Court of Middlesex County, NJ, case number MID-L-367-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9303475), filed by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(CRAWFORD, KELLY) |
Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.