BEATTY v. KEILY BUSINESS SERVICE CO. et al
| THOMAS BEATTY |
| Kiely Business Service Co. and Ray Sexton |
| 3:2019cv06260 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to KIELY BUSINESS SERVICE CO., RAY SEXTON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jmh) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jjc, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS. In the future when choosing parties please choose each party individually. Do NOT select the ALL PLAINTIFFS or ALL DEFENDANTS button . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KIELY BUSINESS SERVICE CO., RAY SEXTON.( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9431817) with JURY DEMAND, filed by THOMAS BEATTY.(MCKINNEY, THOMAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
