BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. v. ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED et al
| BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. |
| ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED and ASCEND LABORATORIES, LLC |
| 3:2020cv02904 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Peter G Sheridan |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 04/29/2020. (jmh)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to all Defendants by BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. (MILLER, KEITH) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. identifying Sebela Holdings, LLC as Corporate Parent.. (MILLER, KEITH) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED, ASCEND LABORATORIES, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg) |
| Filing 3 AO120 Patent Form filed. (mg) |
| Judge Peter G. Sheridan and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED, ASCEND LABORATORIES, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10557536), filed by BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MILLER, KEITH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
