JENKINSON'S PAVILION et al v. BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH et al
JENKINSON'S PAVILION, ANTHONY STOVINO, FRANK STORINO and ANTHONY STORINO |
KEVIN B. RIORDAN, CARYN BYRNES, FRANK STOVINO, DOUGLAS VITALE, BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, ARLENE TESTA, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, PAUL KANITRA, MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH and PAUL M. KANITRA |
3:2020cv11906 |
August 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Douglas E Arpert |
Freda L Wolfson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by All Defendants re #2 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(RIORDAN, KEVIN) |
Filing 7 Letter from Kevin Riordan. (RIORDAN, KEVIN) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by JENKINSON'S PAVILION re #2 MOTION to Dismiss (GASIOROWSKI, ALEXIS) |
Filing 5 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by JENKINSON'S PAVILION re #3 First MOTION to Remand (GASIOROWSKI, ALEXIS) |
Filing 4 BRIEF in Opposition filed by All Defendants re #3 First MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' 8/4/20 Letter)(RIORDAN, KEVIN) |
Filing 3 First MOTION to Remand by JENKINSON'S PAVILION. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Letter to Judge Wolfson, #3 Order)(GASIOROWSKI, ALEXIS) |
Set Deadlines as to #3 First MOTION to Remand . Motion set for 10/5/2020 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jmh) |
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 10/5/2020 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jmh) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants. Responses due by 9/25/2020 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Certification, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(RIORDAN, KEVIN) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Plaintiffs names were spelled incorrectly. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (mg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ARLENE TESTA, DOUGLAS VITALE, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, PAUL KANITRA, BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, KEVIN B. RIORDAN, CARYN BYRNES from Superior Court of NJ - Ocean County Law Division, case number OCN-L-2009-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11280001), filed by ARLENE TESTA, DOUGLAS VITALE, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, PAUL KANITRA, BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, KEVIN B. RIORDAN, CARYN BYRNES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint/Brief)(RIORDAN, KEVIN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.