CHOI v. KEITH
Plaintiff: SONIA CHOI
Defendant: LAURA MICHELLE KEITH
Case Number: 3:2022cv02812
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Douglas E Arpert
Referring Judge: Georgette Castner
2 Judge: Rukhsanah L Singh
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 9/13/2022 at 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 7/5/2022. (kht)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert no longer assigned to case. (dm )
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Reply to defendants #8 Answer to Complaint filed by Sonia Choi (Received via H.D) (abr, )
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint filed by LAURA MICHELLE KEITH.(abr, )
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Having reviewed Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the submissions filed by Plaintiff in connection with the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. #3 ), and for the reasons stated on the record in this Court's Opinion on May 19, 2022, the Court orders that Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. #3 ) is denied. So Ordered by Judge Georgette Castner on 5/20/2022.(adi, )
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Transcript of Court's Opinion on Plaintiffs' Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders held on 5/19/2022, before Judge Georgette Castner. Court Reporter/Transcriber Frank Gable (856-889-4761). (jjc, )
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Georgette Castner: Oral Opinion re: #3 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order read into the record on 5/19/2022. Ordered Motion denied. Order to follow. (Court Reporter, Frank Gable (856-889-4761)) (adi, ) (Main Document 6 replaced on 5/20/2022) (adi, ).
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to LAURA MICHELLE KEITH. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht, )
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by SONIA CHOI. (kht, )
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (kht, ) Modified on 5/13/2022 (kht, ).
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LAURA MICHELLE KEITH ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number TRE126467), filed by SONIA CHOI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope, #3 Proposed Order To Show Cause, #4 Certificate of Service)(kht, ) Modified on 5/13/2022 (kht, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHOI v. KEITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SONIA CHOI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAURA MICHELLE KEITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?