U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. NOVO NORDISK, INC.
| U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
| NOVO NORDISK, INC. |
| 3:2022cv03482 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni no longer assigned to case. (dm)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by KIMBERLY ANNE CRUZ on behalf of UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION (CRUZ, KIMBERLY)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION. NOVO NORDISK, INC. waiver sent on 6/6/2022, answer due 8/5/2022. (CORRALES, EDUMIN)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to NOVO NORDISK, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against NOVO NORDISK INC. with JURY DEMAND, filed by U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CORRALES, EDUMIN)
|
|
Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (kht)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
