DRAZIN et al v. MINTAS
PLAYUPUS |
LAILA MINTAS |
DENNIS A. DRAZIN |
3:2022cv04604 |
July 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Lois H Goodman |
Zahid N Quraishi |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER that in light of Petitioner's letter #5 withdrawing his Motion to Quash #1 , the Court hereby DENIES AS MOOT Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #4 and directs the Clerk's Office to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 8/5/2022. (kas) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (kas, ) |
Filing 5 Letter re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number ANJDC-13562501.), #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . (KESSEL, STEVEN) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by DENNIS A. DRAZIN. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Steven Kessel, #2 Affidavit of Amanda Brookhyser, #3 Statement that No Brief is Necessary, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(KESSEL, STEVEN) |
Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 8/15/2022 before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jdg) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by DENNIS A. DRAZIN Of Motion to Quash (KESSEL, STEVEN) |
Set Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number ANJDC-13562501.). Motion set for 8/15/2022 before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (kht) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - ***Court notes: Please see #2 for supporting documents for Motion #1 . (kht) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The supporting documents #2 of the Motion to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas filed by Steven Kessel on 7/15/2022 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. Please be advised that supporting documents should have been filed under an event in the Responses and Replies menu. This message is for information purposes only. (kht) |
Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (kht) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoena, filed by DENNIS A. DRAZIN. (Attachments: #1 Brief In Support of Petition, #2 Declaration of Amanda Brookhyser, #3 Exhibit First Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit Drazin Subpoena, #5 Exhibit PlayUp's Opening Brief, #6 Exhibit PlayUp's Response, #7 Exhibit Defendant's Request for Production of Documents, #8 Exhibit PlayUp's Motion to Dismiss, #9 Exhibit Brookhyser email, #10 Exhibit Comparative Chart, #11 Exhibit Drazin Motion to Quash Part 1, #12 Exhibit Drazin Motion to Quash Part 2, #13 Exhibit Drazin Motion to Quash Part 3, #14 Exhibit Drazin Motion to Quash Part 4, #15 Exhibit Drazin Reply in Support of Motion to Quash, #16 Exhibit Order Denying Motion to Quash, #17 Exhibit Order Denying Motion to Compel, #18 Text of Proposed Order)(KESSEL, STEVEN) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number ANJDC-13562501.), filed by DENNIS A. DRAZIN.(KESSEL, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.