WARD v. GE APPLIANCES et al
MAUREEN WARD |
HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. a business entity authorized to do business in the State of New Jersey doing business as GE APPLIANCES, XYZ COMPANY (1-10), JOHN DOE RETAILER (1-10), MABE SA DE CV and GE APPLIANCES |
3:2024cv07724 |
July 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Georgette Castner |
J Brendan Day |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 10/29/2024. Signed by Judge Georgette Castner on 8/30/2024. (ijf) |
Filing 7 Letter. (LEE, SUNA) |
Filing 6 LETTER ORDER Granting #5 request for an extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to 9/2/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day on 7/24/2024. (amv) |
Filing 5 Letter from Suna Lee. (LEE, SUNA) |
Filing 4 Diversity Disclosure Statement by GE APPLIANCES, HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.. (LEE, SUNA) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The #3 Application for Clerk's Order Extending Time to Answer submitted by HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 8/2/2024. (jdg, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (kht) |
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (kht) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (jjc, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: D/B/A parties should be added as an ALIAS. Please do not enter them in the First or Last Name Fields . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Judge Georgette Castner and Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day added. (kht) Modified on 7/15/2024 (kht). |
Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (LEE, SUNA) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. doing business as GE APPLIANCES identifying Haier US Appliance Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (LEE, SUNA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. doing business as GE APPLIANCES from Superior Court of NJ, Ocean County, case number OCN-001256-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15512934), filed by HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. doing business as GE APPLIANCES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(LEE, SUNA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.