MAO v. INTAMIN, LTD. et al
YUXING MAO |
SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, INTAMIN, LTD., INTAMIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, INTERRIDE, LLC, SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, JOHN DOE #1-10, ABC CORP. #1-10, ABC CORP. #11-20, SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., JOHN DOE #11-20, SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP. and SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC. |
SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP., SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC. and ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
ABC CORP. #1-10, ABC CORP. #11-20, INTAMIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INTAMIN, LTD., INTERRIDE, LLC, JOHN DOE #1-10, JOHN DOE #11-20, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, arbtre, SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP., YUXING MAO and SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC. |
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, JOHN DOE #1-10, ABC CORP. #1-10, JOHN DOE #11-20, INTAMIN, LTD., INTAMIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INTERRIDE, LLC, YUXING MAO, SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP., SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC. and ABC CORP. #11-20 |
3:2024cv08364 |
August 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael A Shipp |
Rukhsanah L Singh |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Deadlines as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 11/4/2024 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mlh) |
Filing 15 Letter from Christian M. Scheuerman. (SCHEUERMAN, CHRISTIAN) |
Filing 14 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss . (BAEZ, JAMES) |
Filing 13 Diversity Disclosure Statement by ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. (GROSS, LAURENCE) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. Responses due by 9/30/2024. (GROSS, LAURENCE) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. (GROSS, LAURENCE) |
Filing 10 Defendant, Rocky Mountain Amusements, Inc. i/p/a Rocky Mountain Construction Company ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, JOHN DOE #1-10, ABC CORP. #1-10, JOHN DOE #11-20, INTAMIN, LTD., INTERRIDE, LLC, SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP., YUXING MAO, SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC., ABC CORP. #11-20, INTAMIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, COUNTERCLAIM against SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, JOHN DOE #1-10, ABC CORP. #1-10, JOHN DOE #11-20, INTAMIN, LTD., INTERRIDE, LLC, SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP., YUXING MAO, SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC., ABC CORP. #11-20, INTAMIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY by ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.(GROSS, LAURENCE) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Diversity Disclosure Statement #11 filed by LAURENCE IVAN GROSS on 9/24/2024 was submitted incorrectly as a corporate disclosure statement. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Diversity Disclosure Statement USING Diversity Disclosure Statement. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jal, ) |
Set Deadlines as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 10/21/2024 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (kht) Modified on 9/27/2024 (mlh). |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against ABC CORP. #1-10, ABC CORP. #11-20, INTAMIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INTAMIN, LTD., INTERRIDE, LLC, JOHN DOE #1-10, JOHN DOE #11-20, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, arbtre by SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC., SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC., SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP..(NOTARTOMAS, MICHAEL) |
Filing 8 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss . (BAEZ, JAMES) |
Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 10/7/2024 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (kht) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Letter Rule 7.1 Request filed by JAMES ROBERT BAEZ on 8/20/2024 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. PLEASE SUBMIT a Letter Rule 7.1 request USING *LETTER RULE 7.1* found under the *OTHER DOCUMENTS* menu. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jab) |
Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings, #4 MOTION to Dismiss by All Plaintiffs. (BAEZ, JAMES) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES ROBERT BAEZ on behalf of All Plaintiffs (BAEZ, JAMES) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL J. NOTARTOMAS on behalf of SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, SIX FLAGS MANAGEMENT CORP., SIX FLAGS NEW JERSEY LLC, SIX FLAGS SERVICES, INC., SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS INC. (NOTARTOMAS, MICHAEL) |
Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 9/3/2024 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jdg, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by INTAMIN, LTD.. Responses due by 8/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of counsel, #2 Brief in support, #3 Exhibit A Complaint, #4 Exhibit B Tafaro Order, #5 Text of Proposed Order, #6 Certificate of Service)(IRACE, BERNADETTE) |
Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by INTAMIN, LTD.. (IRACE, BERNADETTE) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTIAN M. SCHEUERMAN on behalf of INTAMIN, LTD. (SCHEUERMAN, CHRISTIAN) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #1 "NOTICE OF REMOVAL" submitted by BERNADETTE IRACE on 8/8/2024 appears to have address information as to BOTH PARTIES COUNSEL that does not match the court's records for this case. Please refer to the court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for information and instructions on maintaining your account. (mlh) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (mlh) |
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (mlh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by INTAMIN, LTD. from New Jersey Superior Court Law Division Ocean County, case number OCN-L-1682-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15577937), filed by INTAMIN, LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Complaint, #2 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(IRACE, BERNADETTE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.