v. NACHAMIE
| BARTON NACHAMIE |
| 8:2016mc00160 |
| August 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| MiscCsAsgn Office |
| Jerome B Simandle |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISBARMENT: BARTON NACHAMIE is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law before this Court during such time that he remains disbarred by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and until further order of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 8/31/2016. (tf, n.m.)
|
| ***Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (mrd, ) |
| Filing 1 Copy of Order D-151-15 from the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarring respondent by consent, effective immediately, Further Ordered that respondent's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law. (mrd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: v. NACHAMIE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: BARTON NACHAMIE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
