Anaya v. Hatch et al
| Arturo Anaya |
| Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico |
| 1:2016cv00331 |
| April 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Union |
| Robert A. Junell |
| Stephan M. Vidmar |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez DENYING 52 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Petitioner Arturo Anaya's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal [Doc. 52 ] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (gr)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 41 MOTION for New Trial; and DENYING 38 MOTION for Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Petitioner Arturo Anaya's "Motion to U.S. District Judge on Prima Facie Evidence" [Doc. 38 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for New Trial [Doc. 41 ] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (gr)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez DENYING 33 MOTION for Reconsideration. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Petitioner Arturo Anaya's Motion to U.S. District Judge on Joint Negligence [Doc. 33 ] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (gr)
|
|
Filing
28
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar as to 1 Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. I RECOMMEND that Petitioner be given the option to withdraw his unexhausted claims and proc eed on the remaining claims. Objections to PF&RD are due by October 20, 2017. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (sg)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 12 Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (am)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER TO ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Respondents must answer no later than June 5, 2017. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
