Sandoval v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit New Mexico District Court Sandoval v. United States of America

Sandoval v. United States of America

Plaintiff:	Jonathan Sandoval
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2016cv00410
Filed:	May 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office:	Albuquerque Office
County:	-OUT OF STATE-
Presiding Judge:	Carmen E. Garza
Presiding Judge:	C. LeRoy Hansen
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 18, 2017	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior District Judge C. LeRoy Hansen ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition 12 DENYING 6 Amended MOTION to Vacate a Sentence Under Johnson v. United States filed by Jonathan Sandoval. (bap)
January 27, 2017	Filing 12 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. The Court RECOMMENDS that 6 Plaintiff's Amended MOTION to Vacate a Sentence Under Johnson v. United States be DENIED as outlined in the PF&RD. Objections to PF& RD due by 2/10/2017. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (jrt)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 18, 2017

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior District Judge C. LeRoy Hansen ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition 12 DENYING 6 Amended MOTION to Vacate a Sentence Under Johnson v. United States filed by Jonathan Sandoval. (bap)

January 27, 2017

Filing 12 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. The Court RECOMMENDS that 6 Plaintiff's Amended MOTION to Vacate a Sentence Under Johnson v. United States be DENIED as outlined in the PF&RD. Objections to PF& RD due by 2/10/2017. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (jrt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandoval v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Sandoval
Represented By:	Brian A Pori
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By:	Margaret M Vierbuchen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?