Blake v. Lea County Correctional Facility et al
| Preston J Blake |
| Lea County Correctional Facility, Geo Group, Inc., R. Smith, J. Beaird, L. Rivas and FNU Puente |
| 1:2017cv00807 |
| August 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Bernalillo |
| M. Christina Armijo |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by District Judge Matthew L. Garcia ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 109 Report and Recommendations; ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 118 Report an d Recommendations; ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 137 Report and Recommendations; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE 19 Amended Complaint filed by Preston J Blake; DENYING AS MOOT 80 ORDER on Motion for Order; DENYING AS MOOT 121 ORDER on Mo tion for Order; DENYING AS MOOT 141 ORDER on Motion for Order; DENYING AS MOOT 146 Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint; DENYING AS MOOT 148 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 156 Motion to Appoint Counsel; DENYING AS MOOT [156 ] Motion for Discovery, Motion for Trial, Motion; DENYING AS MOOT 157 Motion; DENYING AS MOOT 160 ORDER on Motion for Order; DENYING AS MOOT 164 Motion, Motion to Appoint Counsel; DENYING AS MOOT 166 Motion to Compel. See Order for specifics. (arp)
|
|
Filing
151
THIRD ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO OBJECT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Plaintiff shall file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 137) entered on 12/16/2022, no later than May 10, 2023.(am)
|
|
Filing
137
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. The Court recommends that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 75) be granted, and that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgmen t or Motion for Mediation and Arbitration (Doc. 78), Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. 119), Motion to Seek Leave to Take Specific Non-Duplicative Discovery (Doc. 120), Motion for Court Ordered Injunction (Doc. 126), Motion for Continuance and Exten sion to Allow Plaintiff [to] File and Submit Facts That Will Show or Create Genuine Issue[s] of Material Fact (Doc. 129), and Motion to Amend Injunction Filed - Motion to Supplement Additional Information and Facts as They Occur (Doc. 130) be denied. Objections to PFRD due by 12/30/2022. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (kmt)
|
|
Filing
118
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa recommending denial of Plaintiff's Motion to Request Preliminary Injunctions (Doc. 97). Objections to PFRD due by 8/24/2022. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (kmt)
|
|
Filing
109
MAGISTRATE JUDGES PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. The Court recommends the Board of County Commissioners of Lea County be granted summary judgment and that it be dismissed as a party to this litigation with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 2/25/2022. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (rps)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior District Judge James A. Parker dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendants Lea County Correctional Facility and Geo Group as further described herein. (bap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
