Aicher v. New Mexico Department of Corrections, et al
Plaintiff: Eric Aicher
Defendant: New Mexico Department of Corrections, The GEO Group, Inc. and Corizon Health Care
Case Number: 1:2018cv00474
Filed: May 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Albuquerque Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Brack
Presiding Judge: Stephan M. Vidmar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 69 Amended Complaint. (yc)
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack DISMISSING 1 Notice of Removal, GRANTING 40 MOTION for Leave to File, AND GRANTING 41 MOTION to Amend/Correct; DENYING 31 MOTION for Default Judgment as to, DENYING [ 44] MOTION for Default Judgment as to, DENYING 37 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Joinder to Motion to Dismiss by Corizon, LLC (Doc. 33), DENYING 30 First MOTIO N for Summary Judgment , DENYING 33 First MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law, DENYING 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court, DENYING DENYING 13 MOTION for Recusal, AND DENYING 47 MOTION to Compel, (yc)
June 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 24 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed with Discovery; DENYING 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Scheduling Conference; and GRANTING 26 Defendant GEO Group's Motion for Protective Order. No party is required to participate in discovery unless and until the Court so orders. (am)
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (am)
June 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 15 Defendant Corizon's Motion for Protective Order (am)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aicher v. New Mexico Department of Corrections, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Aicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Mexico Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The GEO Group, Inc.
Represented By: April D. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corizon Health Care
Represented By: Nicole M Charlebois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?