Korovlev v. City of Albuquerque et al
| Phillip Korovlev |
| Ofc Anaya, Ofc McFarlane, Ray Shultz, City of Albuquerque, Albuquerque Police Department, Hoisington, FNU Hoisington, FNU Anaya and FNU McFarlane |
| 1:2018cv01001 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Karen B Molzen |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Phillip Korovlev voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Garcia, Derek)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 9 Defendant Adam Anaya's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by FNU Anaya. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Phillip Korovlev.(Stoker, Ian) |
| Filing 8 Defendant Hoisington's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by FNU Hoisington. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Phillip Korovlev.(Stoker, Ian) |
| Filing 7 Defendant Ray Schultz's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Ray Shultz. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Phillip Korovlev.(Stoker, Ian) |
| Filing 6 Defendant City of Albuquerque's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Albuquerque. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Phillip Korovlev.(Stoker, Ian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by City of Albuquerque of Appearance and Acceptance of Service (Stoker, Ian) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on CABQ, APD, Anaya, Hoisington on 11/30/2018, filed by Phillip Korovlev. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Summons Returned APD, #2 Affidavit Summons Returned Hoisington, #3 Affidavit Summons Returned Anaya)(Garcia, Derek) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (mnb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Phillip Korovlev Civil Cover Sheet (Garcia, Derek) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kdh) |
| Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (kdh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Employment Discrimination against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Phillip Korovlev. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right to Sue Letter)(Garcia, Derek) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6103333 re #1 Complaint filed by Phillip Korovlev (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Garcia, Derek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
