Romero v. Martinez et al
| Stephen Romero |
| Ashley Martinez, Valencia County, Denise Vigil, Kevin Vega and Valencia Board of County Commissioners |
| Brianna Feerer-Huss |
| 1:2019cv00789 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Carmen E Garza |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing granting #12 Motion to Appoint Guradian Ad Litem. (cda)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Appoint Guardian ad litem ad Litem by Valencia Board of County Commissioners. (Martinez, Jonlyn) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 10 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Stephen Romero, 9 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge,, filed by Kevin Vega, Denise Vigil, Ashley Martinez, Valencia County, Valencia Board of County Commissioners. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Stephen Romero voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Cravens, Richard)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Ashley Martinez, Valencia Board of County Commissioners, Valencia County, Kevin Vega, Denise Vigil voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Martinez, Jonlyn)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Valencia Board of County Commissioners (Martinez, Jonlyn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 2 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (ccp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Stephen Romero Extension (Cravens, Richard) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing VACATING Rule 16 Conference set for 10/17/2019 and all deadlines set in #3 Initial Scheduling Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(2), the Court finds good cause to delay entering a scheduling order at this time due to the pending dispositive motion (Doc. 4). Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 9/20/2019. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (ccp)
|
| Filing 4 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for qualified immunity by Ashley Martinez, Valencia Board of County Commissioners, Valencia County, Kevin Vega, Denise Vigil. (Martinez, Jonlyn) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing setting a telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for 10/17/2019 at 02:00 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 10/10/2019. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 9/20/2019. (cda)
|
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Thirteenth Judicial District, case number D-1314-CV-2019-01023. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit State Court Filings)(Martinez, Jonlyn) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6638478 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Kevin Vega, Denise Vigil, Ashley Martinez, Valencia County, Valencia Board of County Commissioners (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Martinez, Jonlyn) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
