Apodaca v. Warden et al
| Victor Andrew Apodaca |
| Rosa Warden, CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic Inc., FNU Rosa and Jane/John Doe |
| 1:2019cv01209 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| William P Johnson |
| Karen B Molzen |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Add and Terminate Judges. Mail sent to Victor Andrew Apodaca (meq)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Debra J. Moulton on behalf of CoreCivic Inc., FNU Rosa (Moulton, Debra)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Screen Complaint by CoreCivic, Inc., Rosa Warden. (Hanna, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CoreCivic, Inc., Rosa Warden from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, case number D-1333-CV-201900309. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by CoreCivic, Inc., Rosa Warden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanna, Katherine)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6871887 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Rosa Warden, CoreCivic, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Hanna, Katherine)
|
|
United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
