Hatch v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
| Tim Hatch |
| Anthony Romero, David Jablonski, New Mexico Corrections Department and Jerry Roark |
| 1:2020cv00446 |
| May 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SECOND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended until July 30, 2020. (kys)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Tim Hatch. (Davis, Philip) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Settlement Conference set for 7/10/2020 at 09:00 AM remote via Zoom before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. (cda)
|
|
Filing 11
STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is granted. Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by 6/16/2020. (kmt)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Tim Hatch. (Davis, Philip) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing VACATING Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/23/20 AT 2:15 p.m. and all deadlines set in the Initial Scheduling Order (Doc. 3). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(2), the Court finds good cause to delay entering a scheduling order at this time due to the pending dispositive motion (Doc. 4). [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ccp)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 7 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Tim Hatch, 6 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Anthony Romero, David Jablonski, New Mexico Corrections Department, Jerry Roark. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Tim Hatch voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Davis, Philip)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), David Jablonski, New Mexico Corrections Department, Jerry Roark, Anthony Romero voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Sullivan, James)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by David Jablonski, New Mexico Corrections Department, Jerry Roark, Anthony Romero (Sullivan, James) |
| Filing 4 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by David Jablonski, New Mexico Corrections Department, Jerry Roark, Anthony Romero. (Sullivan, James) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/23/2020 at 02:15 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 6/16/2020. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 6/2/2020. (ccp)
|
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7118139 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Anthony Romero, David Jablonski, New Mexico Corrections Department, Jerry Roark (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Sullivan, James) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from First Judicial District Court, case number D-101-CV-2020-00835. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Sullivan, James) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
