Verdream v. United States Marshel Service et al
James P. Verdream |
United States Marshel Service, FNU LNU, Sandoval County Detention Center, U.S. Attorney Office and Devon Fooks |
1:2020cv00544 |
June 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
John F Robbenhaar |
Martha Vazquez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Martha Vazquez. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (gr) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Martha Vazquez. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and the Court will enter a separate judgment closing the civil case. (gr) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty (30) days, Plaintiff must prepay the $400 filing fee, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Any in forma pauperis motion must attach an inmate account statement reflecting transactions between December 5, 2019 and June 5, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Clerks Office shall send Plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (smd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James P. Verdream. (ln) |
United States District Judge Martha Vazquez and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.