Fraire v. Wilkie
| Ramiro Fraire |
| Robert L. Wilkie, Celeste Casaus and Darren Palmer |
| 1:2020cv01171 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FOR SERVICE by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. (kc)
|
|
Filing 7
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Robert L. Wilkie. adding Darren Palmer and Celeste Casaus., filed by Ramiro Fraire. (ln)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FOR SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. (kc)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Robert L. Wilkie., filed by Ramiro Fraire. (arp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar granting #2 Motion to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Order to File Amended Complaint. (kc)
|
|
Filing 3
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (ln)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Ramiro Fraire. (ln)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Robert L. Wilkie, filed by Ramiro Fraire. (ln)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (ln)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
