Stock v. Social Security Administration
| Samuel Stock |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv01297 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samuel Stock. Social Security Administration served on 2/3/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. (vh) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samuel Stock. US Attorney General served on 2/3/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. (vh) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samuel Stock. US Attorney's Office served on 2/5/2021, answer due 4/6/2021. (vh) |
| Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (snw) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (am)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Samuel Stock voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Jarvis, Barbara)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Samuel Stock. (Jarvis, Barbara) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration ( Filing Fee - Waived), filed by Samuel Stock. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Ex B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jarvis, Barbara) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stock v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel Stock | |
| Represented By: | Barbara Jarvis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
