Begay v. Mandelski
Plaintiff: Kerry Begay
Defendant: Keith A. Mandelski
Case Number: 1:2021cv01100
Filed: November 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: William P Johnson
Referring Judge: Karen B Molzen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to Cure Defects by 2/14/2022. (KBM)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Keith A. Mandelski, filed by Kerry Begay. (dr)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (dr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Begay v. Mandelski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerry Begay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith A. Mandelski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?