Palmer v. Hatch et al
| Brian Harris Palmer |
| Tim Hatch, Central New Mexico Correctional Facility, Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility and Ronald Martinez |
| 1:2021cv01223 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| William P Johnson |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 4 Filing Fee Received. Mail sent to Brian Harris Palmer. Envelope had forwarding address on it. Mr. Palmer's address updated. (cmm)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brian Harris Palmer. (cmm)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter and Notice of address change by Brian Harris Palmer. (cmm)
|
|
Filing 4
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number ALB051691 (bp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar granting Movant leave to AMEND or WITHDRAW his Motion by February 14, 2022. (nlb)
|
|
Filing 2
Letter by Brian Harris Palmer. (arp)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brian Harris Palmer. (dr)
|
|
United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
