Harrington v. Dugar
| Blaine Harrington, III |
| Deepak Dugar |
| 1:2022cv00295 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Kea W Riggs |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Disclosure Rule 7.1 Statement by Deepak Dugar. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Rule 7.1 Disclosure) (Squires, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT as to document #9 Motion for Discovery by Blaine Harrington, III (DeSouza, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 13
AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Plaintiff is ordered to withdrawn the Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery. Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due by 06/27/2022. (kc)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery. Response due by 6/13/2022 (kc)
|
|
Filing 11
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery by Deepak Dugar. (Squires, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. (kc)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Discovery by Blaine Harrington, III. (DeSouza, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 21 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (eh)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative to Transfer Venue by Deepak Dugar. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Deepak Dugar, M.D.) (Squires, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deepak Dugar answer due 6/6/2022. (kc)
|
|
Filing 5
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Deepak Dugar. (Squires, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Blaine Harrington, III. Deepak Dugar served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (DeSouza, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
Report re: copyright (dr)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Deepak Dugar, M.D. a Medical Corporation ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Blaine Harrington, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(DeSouza, Daniel)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8228269 re #1 Complaint filed by Blaine Harrington, III (Payment made via Pay.gov)(DeSouza, Daniel)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Deepak Dugar. (jg)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harrington v. Dugar | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Blaine Harrington, III | |
| Represented By: | Daniel DeSouza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Deepak Dugar | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey L Squires |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
