T.H. McElvain Oil & Gas LLLP v. SIMCOE LLC
| T.H. McElvain Oil & Gas LLLP |
| SIMCOE LLC |
| 1:2023cv00974 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Damian L Martinez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/17/2024 at 02:00 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 1/10/2024. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 12/26/2023. (cda)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) Defendant SIMCOE LLC's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint for Breach of Contract and Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Proceeds Payment Act Claim by SIMCOE LLC. (Sutphin, Robert) |
| Filing 8 TO COURT ORDER OF NOVEMBER 7, 2023 RESPONSE re #5 Order filed by T.H. McElvain Oil & Gas LLLP. (Gallegos, Jake) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing granting #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal. SIMCOE LLC's answer due 12/4/2023. (cda)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by SIMCOE LLC. (Serafimova, Olga) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Response due 11/28/2023. (cda)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED Corporate Disclosure Statement by SIMCOE LLC identifying Corporate Parent SIMU LLC, Corporate Parent VEPU Inc. for SIMCOE LLC. (Sutphin, Robert) Modified text on 11/7/2023 (ac). |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SIMCOE LLC identifying Corporate Parent SIMU LLC, Corporate Parent VEPU Inc. for SIMCOE LLC. (Sutphin, Robert) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SIMCOE LLC from First Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County, case number D-101-CV-2023-02226. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by SIMCOE LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Sutphin, Robert) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-9076752 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by SIMCOE LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Sutphin, Robert) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
