Lucero v. Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office
| Orlando G Lucero |
| Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office |
| 1:2024cv00812 |
| August 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Jennifer M Rozzoni |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Letter by Jose Gabriel Lucero (jg)
|
|
Filing 13
Letter by Orlando G. Lucero (jg)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 7 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office, #10 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Orlando G Lucero. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
Filing 11
CM/ECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM by Orlando G Lucero, electing to receive notification via postal mail. (bc)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Orlando G Lucero voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (bc)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 21 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (ajp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(2), the Court finds good cause to delay entering a scheduling order at this time due to the pending dispositive motion (Doc. 5). [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ccp)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Macke, Daniel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 6
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative, MOTION to Stay by Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office. (Macke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office re #1 Notice of Removal, (Macke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office. (Macke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J Macke on behalf of Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office (Macke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office from Bernalillo Metropolitan Court, case number T-4-CV-2024-06941. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Macke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9494286 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Macke, Daniel)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar and United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni assigned. (bc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lucero v. Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Orlando G Lucero | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J Macke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
