Kanmodi v. Ericsson Inc
Kazeem Kanmodi |
Ericsson Inc |
1:2024cv01168 |
November 18, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Joel M Carson |
John F Robbenhaar |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 10. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Kazeem Kanmodi (White, Alyssa) |
![]() |
Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Unopposed Motion by Ericsson Inc. (Neumann, Jon) |
Filing 11 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to Circuit Judge Joel M. Carson, III as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Alyssa White on behalf of Kazeem Kanmodi (White, Alyssa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W Dunlap on behalf of Kazeem Kanmodi (Dunlap, Andrew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A Josephson on behalf of Kazeem Kanmodi (Josephson, Michael) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, to Complaint by Ericsson Inc. (Neumann, Jon) |
![]() |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (eh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ericsson Inc from Santa Fe County First Judicial District Court, case number D-101-cv-2024-02333. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Ericsson Inc. (Attachments: #1 Jon T Neumann Declaration with Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Neumann, Jon) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9644998 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Ericsson Inc (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Neumann, Jon) |
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.