Great Bowery Inc. v. Lea Henderson Aesthetics et al
Plaintiff: Great Bowery Inc. doing business as Trunk Archive
Defendant: Lea Henderson Aesthetics doing business as Beauty and Bar Bells and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Case Number: 1:2025cv00147
Filed: February 12, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Jennifer M Rozzoni
Referring Judge: Steven C Yarbrough
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2025 Filing 4 Report re: copyright (dr)
February 12, 2025 Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
February 12, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE by GREAT BOWERY INC., d/b/a TRUNK ARCHIVE of Interested Parties (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 AO121) (Sarega, Naomi)
February 12, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, LEA HENDERSON AESTHETICS d/b/a BEAUTY AND BAR BELLS ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by GREAT BOWERY INC., d/b/a TRUNK ARCHIVE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sarega, Naomi)
February 12, 2025 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9779569 re #1 Complaint, filed by GREAT BOWERY INC., d/b/a TRUNK ARCHIVE (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Sarega, Naomi)
February 12, 2025 United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni assigned. (dr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Great Bowery Inc. v. Lea Henderson Aesthetics et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Great Bowery Inc. doing business as Trunk Archive
Represented By: Naomi Manea Sarega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lea Henderson Aesthetics doing business as Beauty and Bar Bells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?