Crow et al v. Village of Ruidoso et al
||Adrienne Crow and Rickey Crow
||Village of Ruidoso, Village of Ruidoso Police Department and Aaron Frost
||December 1, 2016
||US District Court for the District of New Mexico
||Las Cruces Office
||Carmen E. Garza
||Stephan M. Vidmar
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 30, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning adopting the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition 33 , granting the Defendants' Motion and Memorandum of Law to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiffs' Complaint and for Qualified Immunity 20 , and dismissing action with prejudice. (kw)
|August 7, 2017
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. It is hereby ordered that 28 Defendants' Motion to Strike is DENIED. It is hereby recommended that 20 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summar y Judgment be GRANTED. Objections to PF&RD due by August 21, 2017. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (sg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?