Daniel & Max LLC v. BAB Holding Company, LLC
| Daniel & Max LLC |
| BAB Holding Company, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00173 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Gregory J Fouratt |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Daniel & Max LLC as to BAB Holding Company, LLC. (Schultz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Daniel & Max LLC voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Schultz, Andrew)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Daniel & Max LLC (Schultz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Damages against BAB Holding Company, LLC ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Daniel & Max LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schultz, Andrew)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (jg)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6313519 re #1 Complaint filed by Daniel & Max LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Schultz, Andrew)
|
|
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniel & Max LLC v. BAB Holding Company, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel & Max LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew G. Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BAB Holding Company, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael B. Allison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
