Najar v. Principal Insurance et al
Plaintiff: Robert R. Najar
Defendant: Principal Insurance, Does I-X and Roe Corporations I-X
Case Number: 2:2021cv00928
Filed: September 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Carmen E Garza
Referring Judge: Martha Vazquez
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2021 Filing 9 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Martha Vazquez as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
October 5, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed within 10 days. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh)
September 28, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Principal Insurance. (Attachments: #1 A (Group Policy)) (Kersting, Edna)
September 28, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Edna S Kersting on behalf of Principal Insurance (Kersting, Edna)
September 22, 2021 Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp)
September 22, 2021 United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (arp)
September 21, 2021 Filing 5 Filing fee received online: $ 402, receipt number ANMDC-7902547 (bap)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
September 21, 2021 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number ANMDC-7902547 re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Principal Insurance Company from State of NM, Dona Ana County, 3rd Judicial District Court, case number D-307-CV-2021-01574. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Principal Insurance Company. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A Summons and Complaint, # 3 Exhibit B Najar Group Policy)(Sweeney, Scott) (cmm)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
September 21, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Principal Insurance identifying Corporate Parent Principal Financial Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Principal Financial Services, Inc. for Principal Insurance. (Sweeney, Scott)
September 21, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Principal Insurance Company from State of NM, Dona Ana County, 3rd Judicial District Court, case number D-307-CV-2021-01574. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Principal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B Najar Group Policy)(Sweeney, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Najar v. Principal Insurance et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert R. Najar
Represented By: Pete Domenici, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Principal Insurance
Represented By: Scott Sweeney
Represented By: Edna S Kersting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does I-X
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roe Corporations I-X
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?